I’ve seen this girl in many dramas. The credit you’re giving her actually goes to the writers and directors.”•”The only credit she deserves is for her makeup because she looks the same in every drama.”•“For me, Alyzeh is a zero—not just in this drama but in every drama. She never steps out of her curls, lipstick, and looks.”Rubina’s remarks led to a heated debate on the show, with fellow actors Atiqa Odho and Nadia Jamil also weighing in.Social Media Backlash Against Rubina Ashraf

Fans and netizens have strongly condemned Rubina’s comments, calling them unnecessary and mean-spirited. Many pointed out that such remarks contribute to the toxic environment in the entertainment industry.Fan Reactions:•”If only makeup makes an actor, then half of the industry should be called ‘zero’.”•”This seems like personal envy—Alyzeh is stunning, and Rubina’s criticism feels bitter.”•”Why only target actresses? If scripts and directors deserve credit, then male actors should be judged the same way.”•”Stop harassing Alyzeh. She’s been through enough depression and bullying.”

Alyzeh Shah’s Struggles in the IndustryAlyzeh Shah has been vocal about facing harassment, boycott, and mental health challenges due to industry politics. Recently, she accused senior artists and producers, including Shazia Manzoor, of trying to “bring her down.“She vowed to expose all those targeting her, stating she will not back down. However, she has not yet responded to Rubina Ashraf’s resurfaced comments.

This viral controversy highlights the toxic culture of criticism in showbiz, where senior artists often belittle newcomers. While constructive feedback is necessary, public shaming and harsh remarks can have severe effects on mental health.

Background: The Past Conflict

Sarwat Gilani and her husband, Dr. Fahad Mirza, were among the celebrities who spoke out against Feroze Khan a few years ago during allegations of domestic abuse against his ex-wife. In response, Feroze reportedly sent them legal notices and leaked their personal contact numbers online — a move that sparked widespread outrage.

The Podcast Statement

In a recent appearance on the show Nuqta-e-Pakistan, Sarwat didn’t hold back. She criticized Feroze’s choice of roles, saying:

> “Feroze Khan often portrays toxic male characters who physically abuse women, yet the same women fall in love with them by the end of the drama. That’s a dangerous narrative to feed the public.”

She further compared public reactions, pointing out the hypocrisy:

> “When filmmaker Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy highlights real social issues through documentaries, people have a problem. But when these same issues are shown in dramas, they’re entertained.”

Public Response and Criticism

Soon after the podcast clip went viral, Feroze Khan’s fans reacted strongly. Many accused Sarwat of dragging Feroze’s name unnecessarily.

One user commented:

> “Why single out Feroze? Danish Taimoor’s dramas follow the same pattern too.”

Another added:

> “If Sarwat had given her ex-husband the attention she’s giving Feroze Khan, maybe she wouldn’t have needed a second marriage.”

Double Standards in the Industry?

The incident has reignited a larger debate about violence in TV dramas, celebrity accountability, and selective criticism in the entertainment industry. While some support Sarwat’s bold stance, others believe she’s rehashing old issues for attention.

Whether justified or not, Sarwat Gilani’s remarks have reopened a controversial chapter in Pakistani celebrity culture. The reaction highlights not just public loyalty to stars like Feroze Khan, but also the industry’s ongoing struggle to balance entertainment with ethical storytelling.